PSAM14 - Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management
Monday, September 17, 2018



Program Book - Schedule - Monday - Tuesday - Wednesday - Thursday - Friday - SEARCH PAPERS

KEY: -Paper; -Presentation

M00 Plenary Session
The Challenges (and Opportunities) Facing The Risk Sciences
B. John Garrick
B. John Garrick Institute for Risk Sciences, UCLA
M02 Maintenance Modelling and Optimization
31 Dynamic Sequential Decision Making for Missions and Maintenances Scheduling for a Deteriorating Vehicle
Elodie Robert (a,b), Christophe Berenguer (a), Keomany Bouvard, Hoceane Tedie (b), and Romain Lesobre (c)
a) Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP**, GIPSA-lab, F-38000 Grenoble, France, b) Volvo Group Trucks Technology, 69800 Saint-Priest, France, c) ARQUUS, 78284 Guyancourt, France
192 A Methodology for Railway Track Maintenance Modelling Using Plausible Petri Nets
Manuel Chiachio (a,b), Juan Chiachio, Darren Prescott, John Andrews (a)
a) Resilience Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, (UK), b) Dept. of Structural Mechanics & Hydraulics Engineering, University of Granada, Granada, (Spain)
256 Probabilistic Maintenance Optimization for Fatigue-critical Components with Constraint in Repair Access and Logistics
Guang Zou (a,b), Kian Banisoleiman (a), and Arturo González (b)
a) Lloyd’s Register Group Limited, Southampton, UK, b) University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
M03 Reliability Analysis I
7 New Components Reliability Demonstration for Subsea Factory
A.Di Padova, F.Tallone (a), G.Cassetti, M.Piccini (b)
a) Saipem S.p.A. - Onshore E&C Plant and Floaters Division, Fano, Italy, b) RAMS&E, Torino, Italy
30 Modeling the Effect of Air Temperature and Pressure on the Reliability of a Passive Containment Cooling System
Yu Yu (a), Francesco Di Maio (b), Enrico Zio (b,c), Bin Wang, Shengfei Wang, Zhangpeng Guo, Xuefeng Lyu, And Fenglei Niu (a)
a) School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Beijing Key Laboratory of Passive Safety Technology for Nuclear Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China, b) Energy Department, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy, c) Chair on System Science and Energetic Challenge, European Foundation for New Energy – EDF, Ecole Centrale de Paris and Supelec, Paris, France
32 Development of Software Test-based Reliability Assessment Method for Nuclear Power Plant Safety-critical Software
Sang Hun Lee (a), Seung Jun Lee (b), Jinkyun Park (c), Eun-chan Lee (d), and Hyun Gook Kang (a)
a) Department of Mechanical Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, NY, USA, b) School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea, c) Integrated Safety Assessment Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), Daejeon, Republic of Korea, d) Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea
74 System Reliability Analysis and Probabilistic Safety Assessment to Support the Design of a New Containment Cooling System for Severe
Accident Management at NPP Paks
Tamas Siklossy, Attila Bareith, David Hollo, Zoltan Karsa, Gabor Lajtha, Jenő Nigicser, Peter Siklossy
NUBIKI Nuclear Safety Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
M04 Risk and Hazard Analysis I
23 Assessing Combinations of Hazards in a Probabilistic Safety Analysis
Halbert Taekema, and Hans Brinkman
NRG, Arnhem, The Netherlands
27 Modelling of Failures of Multiple Redundant Trains of the Electrical Power Supply System of NPPs in PSA
B. Brück, G. Gänßmantel, A. Kreuser, C. Müller, E. Piljugin, M. Utschick, and J. C. Stiller
Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) gGmbH, Köln, Germany
64 Assessment of Rockfall Hazard Induced by Earthquake for Important Facility
I.Yoshdia, Y.Kasuga (a), M.Sato, H.Nakase (b), and S.Nakamura (c)
a) Tokyo City University, Tokyo, Japan, b) Tokyo Electric Power Services Co.,Ltd, Tokyo, Japan, c) Nihon University, Koriyama, Japan
17 A Tool to Support Improved Outage Risk Management
Shawn St. Germain and Jaques Hugo
Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, USA
M05 Risk Assessment Methods I
12 A Bayesian Solution to Incompleteness in Probabilistic Risk Assessment
Chris Everett (a), Homayoon Dezfuli (b)
a) ISL, New York, NY, USA, b) NASA, Washington, DC, USA
59 Adapting Traditional Logic Modeling Techniques to Address Cyberattack
R. Youngblood and K. Le Blan
Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho
62 Pathology-Informed Approach in Vulnerability Assessment Methods
Polinpapilinho F. Katina (a,b,c), Adrian V. Gheorghe (b) and Charles B. Keating (a,b)
a) National Centers for System of Systems Engineering, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, b) Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, c) Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Worldwide Campus
403 Risk Assessment Methods for Comparative Assessment of Options for Decommissioning of Subsea
Luiz Fernando Oliveira*, Joaquim Domingues, Mariana Bardy, Thábata Maciel, and Silvia Schaffel
DNV GL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
M06 Water and Land Transportation I
50 Risk Analysis of Ship Foundering Using the Hybrid Causal Logic Methodology
Kai Zhang, Di Zhang, Cun-long Fan, Ming-yang Zhang (a,b) and Ali Mosleh (c)
a) Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Wuhan, P.R. China, b) National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan, P.R. China, c) The B. John Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences at UCLA, L.A., USA
120 A Game-Theoretic Method to Efficiently Assess the Vulnerability of a Dynamic Transportation Network
Venkateswaran Shekar, Lance Fiondella (a), Samrat Chatterjee, and Mahantesh Halappanavar (b)
a) University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, USA, b) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, USA
186 Producing Effective Maintenance Strategies to Control Railway Risk
Claudia Fecarotti and John Andrews
Resilience Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
152 Risk Simulation Analysis of the Vehicle Velocity in Reduced Visibility Conditions at Bridge-Tunnel Transition Sections
Dianliang Xiao (a), Yujia Tian (b), and Yong Fang (c)
a) Safety and Emergency Research Center, China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing, China, b) School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China, c) The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
M07 Risk Informed Applications I
21 Development of Approach to Establishment of Risk Informed Accident Management and Management Class in Severe Accident
Shinya Kamata (a), Nobuyuki Ueda (b)
a) Japan Nuclear Safety Institute, Tokyo, Japan, b) Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Tokyo, Japan
79 Generic Safety Issue 191: Risk Informed Application at South Texas Project
Mary Anne Billings, Kristin Kaspar (a), and Ernest John Lowry Kee (b)
a) STP Nuclear Operating Company, Wadsworth, USA, b) University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA
137 Application of Probabilistic Risk Assessment to Cyber Security of a Nuclear Power Plant
Jong Woo Park, Seung Jun Lee
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Korea
37 Surveillance Frequency Control Program Implementing Insights
Zhiping Li (a,b), Mary Anne Billings (b)
a) Ameren Missouri, Fulton, USA, b) STP Nuclear Operating Company, Wadsworth, USA
M11 Risk Perception and Communication
63 The Dynamics of Risk Perception for Soft Target Terrorism
Matt Baucum, Richard John (a), Marcus Mayorga(b,c), Paul Slovicbc, William Burns(b), Kent Portney, & Jeryl Mumpower (d)
a) University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A., b) Decision Research, Eugene, OR, U.S.A., c) University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, U.S.A., d) Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, U.S.A.
359 Risk Analysis of Taiwan Food Import from Japan after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident
Tsu-Mu Kao
Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taiwan
429 The MIT Symposium on Realizing the Value of Nuclear Energy, 26 and 27 March 2018
Michael W. Golay
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
116 Recognition of Risk Information --- Adaptation of J. Bertin's Ordinal Matrix for Social Communication
Keiichi Ishida
Hosei University / Zurich Insurance company, Tokyo, Japan
M12 Prognostics and System Health Management I
47 Reliability-Based Regression Model for Complex Systems Considering Environmental Uncertainties
Amin Moniri-Morad, Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad, Hamid Aghababaei (a), Javad Sattarvand (b)
a) Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran, b) University of Nevada Reno, Reno, USA
112 A Comprehensive Sensor Placement Determination in Condition Monitoring Process Using Combined Fault Detection, Fault Diagnosis and Risk
Indexes
Farzin Salehpour-Oskouei (a), Mohammad Pourgol -Mohammad (b)
a) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shabestar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shabestar, Iran, b) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran
161 On the Application of Machine Learning Techniques in Condition Monitoring Systems of Complex Machines
Marcin Hinz, Dominik Brueggemann, and Stefan Bracke
University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
139 Prognostics using Particle filter for Steam Generator Tube Rupture in Nuclear Power Plants
Gibeom Kim (a), Hyeonmin Kim (b), and Gyunyoung Heo (a)
a) Kyung Hee University, b) Nuclear ICT research division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Republic of Korea
M13 Oil and Gas Industry
118 Pressure Vessel Fitness-for-Service Evaluation Based on API579 and API581 Standards
Ramon Sandim Espíndola Gomes, Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza
University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
361 Use of Simplified Risk Assessment Methodology in the Process Industry
Mardy Kazarians, Kirk Busby
Kazarians & Associates, Inc., Glendale, USA
260 Identification of the Main Contributors to the Security of Supply in a Gas Transmission Network
Vytis Kopustinskas, Pavel Praks
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) Directorate C for Energy, Transport and Climate, Ispra, Italy
285 Dragged anchors interaction scenarios: detailed frequency analysis for Pipeline Design
A. Di Padova, C. Zuliani, and F. Tallone
Saipem S.p.A. – Onshore E&C Plant and Floaters Division, Fano, Italy
M14 Industrial Safety
15 Agile Practices When Developing Safety Systems
Thor Myklebust, Narve Lyngby (a), and Tor Stålhane (b)
a) SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway, c) NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
270 Analysis on Safety Defect of Port Dangerous Goods Enterprise
Zhiqiang Hou, Xiaoyu Wang, and Yongrui Wen
China Waterborne Transport Research Institute, Beijing, China
214 Multi-Sectioned Predictive Model of Cable Insulation under Reaction- and Diffusion-Controlled Degradation
Yuan-Shang Chang and Ali Mosleh
B. John Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences, and Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA
M15 External Hazard PSA/PRA I
6 Fragility Evaluation with Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty against Fault Displacement for Reactor Buildings
Hirokazu Tsuji (a), Minoru Kanechika, Yoshinori Mihara, and Kenshiro Ishiki (b)
a) Japan Nuclear Safety Institute, Tokyo, Japan, b) Kajima Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
35 Loss of Offsite Power Frequency Estimates Due to External Events at a Finnish Nuclear Power Plant
Mikael Biese
Fennovoima Oy, Helsinki, Finland
66 Computation of Annual Strike Probability of a Wind-borne Tumbling Missile using TOMAXI
Yuzuru Eguchi, Soichiro Sugimoto, Yasuo Hattori, Takahiro Murakami and Hiromaru Hirakuchi
Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Abiko, JAPAN
104 Coupling Large-Scale and Detailed Site Flooding Simulations
Niels Montanari, Ramprasad Sampath (a), Donna Calhoun (b), Steven Prescott, Curtis Smith (c)
a) Centroid LAB, Inc., Mar Vista, CA, USA, b) Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA, c) Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, USA
M16 Aeronautics and Aerospace I
20 Identification of Safety Critical Scenarios for Airlines using Machine Learning in Filter Trees
Lukas Höhndorf and Florian Holzapfel
Institute of Flight System Dynamics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, German
244 Experience Gained from Developing a PRA During the Design Phase of NASA Human Exploration Missions
Diana L. DeMott (a), Roger L. Boyer, Mark Bigler (b), Courtenay B. Clifford, and C. Joseph Kahn (a)
a) SAIC, Houston, Texas, USA, b) NASA, Houston, Texas, USA
277 Modeling In-Space Aborts for NASA Human Exploration Missions
Mark A. Bigler
NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, USA
M17 Special Session: Overview & Progress in MUPRA
38 A Study for Identifying Multi-Unit Initiating Event and Estimating Frequency
Seungwoo Lee, Ar Ryum Kim, Namchul Cho, Sokchul Kim, Hyowon Kim, and Dohyoung Kim
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety(KINS), Daejeon, Korea
124 An Emergency Response Study during Multi-Unit Accidents
Wonjong Song, Hoyoung Shin, and Moosung Jae
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea
125 A Consideration of the Single Release Location for the Multi-Unit Accidents
Yein Seo, Hyunae Park, Byeong-Mun Ahn, and Moosung Jae
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
113 A Study of Multi-Unit Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment
Taotao Zhoua, Mohammad Modarres (a), and Enrique López Droguett (a,b)
a) Center for Risk and Reliability, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, b) Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
M21 HRA for Digital Interfaces
235 HRA Data for Performance Shaping Factors Reflecting Digital MCR
Sun Yeong Choi, Yochan Kim, and Jinkyun Park
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon, Rep. of Korea
72 Some insights for assessing diagnosis error probabilities of operators in advanced MCRs
Ar Ryum Kim, Seung Woo Lee, Namcul Cho, Ji Tae Kim, Dohyoung Kim, and Sok Chul Kim
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
227 Expanding GOMS-HRA from Analog to Digital Human-Machine Interfaces
Thomas A. Ulrich and Ronald L. Boring
Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, USA
M22 Structural Reliability Analysis Methods
82 Comparison of Non-Standard Simulation Methods for Performing Extremely Low Probability Assessments
Robert E. Kurth, Cédric J. Sallaberry
Engineering Mechanics Corporation of Columbus (Emc2) Columbus, OH, USA
178 Thermodynamic Entropy Generation Model for Metal Fatigue Failure
Hossein Salimi, Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad, Mojtaba Yazdani
Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran
103 Efficient Sampling Strategies to Estimate Extremely Low Probabilities
Cédric J. Sallaberry, Robert E. Kurth
Engineering Mechanics Corporation of Columbus (Emc2) Columbus, OH, USA
381 A Case Study on Influence of Subgrade Slope Blasting on Existing Bridge Safety
Haoran Song and Dianliang Xiao
China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing, China
M23 Dynamic PSA/PRA I
48 Case Study of Major Accident to Demonstrate the Possibility of Prediction of Conditions for Accidents
Tiantian Zhu, Stein Haugen (a), Yiliu Liu, Kim Hyungju (b)
a) Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, b) Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
54 Addressing Critical Dependencies in the Probabilistic Performance Assessments of Multi-Purpose Systems with PyCATSHOO
Hassane Chraibi, Dominique Vasseur, Tu Duong Le Duy And Mickaël Hassanaly
EDF, Paris Saclay Lab - PERICLES - Palaiseau, France
85 Mitigation Coverage Evaluation of Passive Systems Based on Causality Estimation Using Multi-Level Flow Model
In Seop Jeon, Junyung Kim, Robby Christian, Hyun Gook Kang
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, USA
76 EMRALD, Dynamic PRA for the Traditional Modeler
Steven Prescott, Curtis Smith, and Leng Vang
Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, USA
M24 Internal Hazards PSA/PRA I
61 Application of Fire PSA in Defining System Reliability Criteria: Detection and Suppression Systems in I&C Electrical Panel Room
Marcos Coelho Maturana (a,b), Luciano Lucas Bruno (a), and Marcelo Ramos Martins (b)
a) CTMSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil, b)LABRISCO/USP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
92 Insights from Internal Fire PSA of UK ABWR in Generic Design Phase
Yuki Ishiwatari, Daichi Shiota (a), and Paul Guymer (b)
a) Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy, Ltd., Hitachi, Japan, b) Jacobsen Analytics Ltd, Congleton, United Kingdom
100 Analysis of Turbine Missile & Turbine-Generator Overspeed Protection System Failure Probability at NPPs: A case study from PSA
perspective
Duško Kančev, Stefan Heussen, Jens-Uwe Klügel, Thomas Kozlik, Pere Drinovac
NPP Goesgen-Daeniken AG, Kraftwerkstrasse CH-4658 Daeniken, Switzerland
160 Monte Carlo Simulation of NUREG/CR 6850 Appendix L Model for Main Control Board Fires and Resulting Insights
Paul Boneham, Paul Guymer, Mike Wright
Jacobsen Analytics Ltd, Congleton, United Kingdom
M25 Accident Analysis and Modeling I
164 Qualitative PRA Insights from Operational Events
Nathan Siu, Ian Gifford, Zeechung Wang, Meredith Carr, and Joseph Kanney
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, USA
215 MELCOR2.2/SNAP Analysis of Oxidation Response during Spent Fuel Pool Quenching
Wei-Yuan Cheng, Yu Chiang (a), Jong-Rong Wang (b), Shao-Wen Chen (a), Chunkuan Shih (b)
a) Institute Of Nuclear Engineering And Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, b) Nuclear And New Energy Education And Research Foundation, Hsinchu
42 The methodology of Plant Damage State and Containment Event Tree development in the Low Power Shutdown Probabilistic Safety
Assessment Level 2 using T/H analysis code
Jae Gab Kim, Myung Ro Kim, Bae Hyuk Kwon
KEPCO-E&C, Integrated Engineering Department, Korea
370 Containment Isolation System Analysis and its Contribution to Level 2 PSA Results in Doel 3 Unit
Marius Lontos, Stanislas Mitaillé, And Shizhen Yu, Jérémy Bulle
TRACTEBEL ENGIE, Brussels, Belgium
M26 Mathematical Methods in Reliability & Safety I
67 Improved Bayesian Update Method for Components Failure Rates
Ali Ayoub (a), Valerio Ariu and Olivier Nusbaumer (b)
a) ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Nuclear Energy Systems, Zurich, Switzerland, b) Kernkraftwerk Leibstadt, Department Support Safety & Engineering, Leibstadt, Switzerland
282 Large Satellite Bus Reliability
Teri Hamlin and Bruce Reistle
NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, USA
406 A Fault Prediction Approach Based on Bayesian Network for System
Tianyu Si, Weiwei Hu, Yuna Liu, and Jiamin Liu
School of Reliability and System Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
M27 Special Session: Global and Catastrophic Risks