PSAM14 - Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management
Friday, September 21, 2018



Program Book - Schedule - Monday - Tuesday - Wednesday - Thursday - Friday - SEARCH PAPERS

KEY: -Paper; -Presentation

F02 New Developments in HRA
133 Overview of the 2017 Revision to IEEE Standard 1082: Guide for Incorporating Human Reliability Analysis into Probabilistic Risk Assessments for Nuclear Power Generating Stations and Other Facilities
Ronald Laurids Boring
Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA
142 Errors of Commission in HRA – NPSAG Phase 1 Project
Xuhong He (a), Cilla Andersson (b), Anders Olsson (a), Julia Ljungbjörk, Anders Karlsson (c), Lovisa Nordlof, Karl Gustafsson (d), Lasse Tunturivuori (e), Per Hellström (f)
a) Lloyd’s Register Consulting AB, Stockholm, Sweden, b) Ringhals AB, Väröbacka, Sweden, c) Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB, Östhammar, Sweden, d) OKG AB, Oskarshamn, Sweden, e) Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, Olkiluoto, Finland, f) Strål Säkerhets Myndigheten, Stockholm, Sweden
53 An Introduction of Simulator Exercises and Operator Interviews in support of C-2 Human Reliability Analysis
Yongping Qiu, Yucheng Zhuo, Wenjing Lei, Juntao Hu
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China
F03 Site Level (Multi-Unit, Multi-Source) PSA/PRA III
335 Analysis of Different Quantitative Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plants
Ji Suk Kim, Man Cheol Kim
Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
394 Application of Bayes’ Theorem for Risk-Informed Decision-Making at the Decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
Tu Guang Tan, Sunghyon Jang, And Akira Yamaguchi
The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
395 Development of Multi-Unit Dependency Evaluation Model Using Markov Process and Monte Carlo Method
Sunghyon Jang, and Akira Yamaguchi
Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
F04 Risk and Hazard Analysis VI
371 Tools and Methods for Assessing the Risk Associated with Consequential Steam Generator Tube Rupture
Mohamad Ali Azarm (a) and S. Sancaktar (b)
a) Innovative Engineering and Safety Solutions, Germantown, MD, USA, b) Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, USA
372 Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the Spent Fuel Pools of Olkiluoto 1 and 2 NPP Units
Simo Sihvola (a), Lasse Tunturivuori (b)
a) Platom Oy, Mikkeli, Finland, b) Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, Eurajoki, Finland
402 Analysis of Precursor Accidents in Nuclear Power
Spencer Wheatley, Wolfgang Kröger (a), Olivier Nusbaumer (b), & Didier Sornette (a)
a) ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, b) Leibstadt Nuclear Power Plant, Leibstadt, Switzerland
F05 Risk Assessment Methods VI
111 Perceived Low Risk Processes Can Be Important - Lessons to a Regulator Based on a Nuclear Fuel Facility Process Event
Donnie Harrison, April Smith
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
426 Challenges, Solution Proposals and Research Directions in Safety and Risk Assessment of Autonomous Shipping
J. Montewka (a,c), K. Wróbel (a), E. Heikkila (b), O. Valdez-Banda (c), F. Goerlandt (d,c), S. Haugen (e)
a) Gdynia Maritime University, Poland, b) VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland, c) Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, d) Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, e) NTNU Trondheim, Norway
405 Fire Source Ignition Frequencies Determined from the International OECD FIRE Database
Marina Roewekamp (a), Nicholas Melly (b), Andreas Werner (c)
a) Gesellschaft fuer Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) gGmbH, Koeln, German, b) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Office of Research, Washington, DC, USA, c) Safety Assessment Consulting (SAC), Breitbrunn, Germany